Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Jason Jung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Mcdonald vs J. Jung

Mackenzie Mcdonald

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'10" (178 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

112

C. Rank

856

Best Rank

114

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.5M

Career Money

$350.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Jason Jung

TPE

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'10" (178 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

112

C. Rank

856

Best Rank

114

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.5M

Career Money

$350.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Mcdonald 1 - 1 Jung

They have played 5 sets in total, with Mackenzie Mcdonald winning 3 and Jason Jung winning 2. The last match between Jason Jung and Mackenzie Mcdonald was at the San Francisco Challenger, 08-02-2018, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 1-6 7-6(3) 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mcdonald	1
Jung	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R2) San Francisco Challenger(02-08-18)

Stats

Jason Jung

Mackenzie Mcdonald

(R1) Granby Challenger(07-25-17)

Stats

Mackenzie Mcdonald

Jason Jung

M. Mcdonald vs J. Jung H2H Profile

M. Mcdonald	Stats	J. Jung
$3,450,170	Career Prize Money	$350,585
55.94% (353-278)	Career Total W/L	55.35% (414-334)
1	Hard	0
0	Indoor	1
6	Titles	8
1	Total H2H Matches	1
37.04% (10-17)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Mcdonald vs J. Jung Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mackenzie Mcdonald has won 44.00% of points on their second serve, while Jason Jung has won 46.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mackenzie Mcdonald, in recent form, has won 43.32% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jason Jung has won 48.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.58% and 28.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mackenzie Mcdonald has saved 54.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jason Jung has saved 52.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mackenzie Mcdonald has won 56.34% of matches played (W/L 40/31), with Jason Jung winning 22.22% (W/L 2/7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mackenzie Mcdonald has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 229/161), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 23/39). Jason Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 308/223), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/26).
Player level: In the last year, Mackenzie Mcdonald has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 16/12), where as Jason Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 22.22% of matches (W/L 2/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mackenzie Mcdonald winning 1 times and Jason Jung being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Mackenzie Mcdonald winning 3 and Jason Jung winning 2.
The last match between Mackenzie Mcdonald and Jason Jung was at the San Francisco Challenger, 08-02-2018, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 1-6 7-6(3) 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:12.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mackenzie Mcdonald has played against opponents with an average rank of 170.79 while Jason Jung has played against players with an average rank of 326.78.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mackenzie Mcdonald has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jason Jung has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mackenzie Mcdonald has converted 33.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jason Jung has converted 41.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Jason Jung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Mcdonald vs J. Jung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Mcdonald	Stats	J. Jung
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	2
26	Games Won	18
5	Aces (Total)	5
6	Total Double Faults	5
1:26:12	Average Match Time	1:26:12
54% (67/124)	1st Serve %	59% (82/139)
70% (47/67)	1st Serve Win %	60% (49/82)
53% (30/57)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (27/57)
63% (10/16)	Break Pts Won %	45% (5/11)
45% (63/139)	Return Points Win %	38% (47/124)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Mcdonald Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hellenic Championship - Athens - 03-11-2025
R1 Tomas Martin EtcheverryT. Martin	L	6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3	Stats
Q3 Shintaro MochizukiS. Mochizuki	W	4-6 6-2 6-2	Stats
Q1 Marco TrungellitiM. Trungelliti	W	2-6 6-2 7-5	Stats
Bratislava 2 Challenger - 27-10-2025
R2 Chris RodeschC. Rodesch	L	7-6(2) 5-7 7-5	Stats
R1 Jaime FariaJ. Faria	W	6-3 7-6(6)	Stats

View All

J. Jung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	1-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
R2 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
R1 Arthur WeberA. Weber	W	6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(6)	Stats
Suzhou Challenger - 20-10-2025
R1 James McCabeJ. McCabe	L	6-7(4) 6-4 6-2	Stats
Shenzhen Challenger - 13-10-2025
R2 Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida	L	6-3 2-0 ret.	Stats

View All

M. Mcdonald vs J. Jung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Mcdonald	Stats	J. Jung
55.94% (353/278)	YTD Win/Loss	55.35% (414/334)
55.31% (849/686)	Sets Win/Loss	54.67% (949/787)
51.92% (7634/7070)	Games Win/Loss	51.99% (8605/7946)
58.72% (229/161)	Hard Win/Loss	58.00% (308/223)
37.10% (23/39)	Clay Win/Loss	49.21% (31/32)
57.14% (60/45)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.93% (55/53)
55.41% (41/33)	Grass Win/Loss	43.48% (20/26)
0.37	Aces Per Game	0.24
2633	Aces Total	1949
0.2	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
1432	Total Double Faults	1621
1:33:41	Average Match Time	1:12:48
407.62	Average Opponent Rank	566.24
63% (27359/43123)	1st Serve %	63% (25533/40298)
70% (19126/27359)	1st Serve Win %	68% (17485/25533)
51% (8101/15764)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (7548/14765)
42% (1721/4077)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (1594/3943)
39% (17036/44007)	Return Points Win %	39% (16005/40933)
48.48% (32/34)	Slam W/L	38.89% (14/22)
47.25% (43/48)	Masters W/L	18.18% (2/9)
80.00% (4/1)	Cups W/L	40.00% (2/3)
48.92% (91/95)	Main Tour W/L	46.25% (37/43)
63.68% (142/81)	Challenger W/L	53.93% (240/205)
68.33% (41/19)	Futures W/L	69.59% (119/52)
57% (329/577)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	57% (409/720)
42% (21/50)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	9% (2/22)
50% (105/210)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (122/241)
46% (89/193)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (113/218)
80% (369/297)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (416/352)
20% (369/72)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (416/64)
21% (262/56)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (331/61)